the Effect of Multiple Usage and Coarseness of Diamond Burs on Marginal Microleakage of Composite Resin Restorations in Primary Teeth (In-Vitro Study)
الملخص
Aim: To compare the effect of multiple usage and coarseness of diamond burs on marginal microleakage of resin composite restorations.
Materials and methods: Ninety extracted primary molars were chosen. The sample was randomly divided into three groups: N1=N2=N3=30. Group (1) was prepared by using super coarse diamond burs. Group (2) was prepared by using coarse diamond burs. Group (3) was prepared by using medium coarse diamond burs. All cavities were restored by resin composite, then the teeth were thermocycled and immersed in 5% solution of methylene blue dye for 12 hours. Then the teeth were sectioned vertically, dye penetration was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at the occlusal and gingival margins. Data were collected and statistical analysis was conducted.
Results: The results showed that the multiple use of super coarse diamond burs caused no statistically significant difference on occlusal and gingival microleakage (P>0.05). However, the multiple use of coarse and medium diamond burs caused statistically significant difference on gingival marginal microleakage (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, it can be concluded that the multiple use of super coarse diamond burs did not affect on occlusal and gingival microleakage. Whereas the multiple use of coarse and medium diamond burs affected only on gingival marginal microleakage.
References
2. Aysegül, O., Nurhan, O., Haluk, B., & Dilek, T. (2005). Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion. Oper Dent, 30(2), 164-169.
3. Borsatto. (2013). Bond durability of Er:YAG laser-prepared primary tooth enamel. Braz Dent J, 24(4), 330-334. doi:10.1590/0103-6440201302217
4. Choi, K. K. (2000). Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent, 12(4), 216-226. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00224.x
5. Dačić, S., Mitić, A., Nikolić, M., Cenić, M., Stošić, N., & Dačić-Simonović, D. (2016). The effect of polymerization technique on marginal index of composite fillings in dentin. Acta facultatis medicae Naissensis, 33(2), 127-134.
6. Elhendawi, F. M. (2020). Evaluation of Microleakage and Microtensile Bond Strength of Two Bulk Fill Composites in Primary Teeth after Caries Removal by Chemomechanical Technique. Dental Science Updates, 1(2), 141-150.
7. Eltoum, N. A. (2019). Microleakage evaluation of bulk-fill composite in class II restorations of primary molars. Alexandria Dental Journal, 44(1), 111-116.
8. Fraunhofer, v. (2005). The effect of multiple uses of disposable diamond burs on restoration leakage. J Am Dent Assoc, 136(1), 53-57; quiz 90. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0026
9. Garg, N. (2010). Textbook of operative dentistry: Boydell & Brewer Ltd.
10. Ghassan, E., & Almohammad, A. S. (2017). THE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE USAGE AND SURFACE COARSENESS OF DIAMOND BURS ON MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE OF RESIN COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS.
11. Goldstein, R. E., Lamba, S., Lawson, N. C., Beck, P., Oster, R. A., & Burgess, J. O. (2017). Microleakage around class V composite restorations after ultrasonic scaling and sonic toothbrushing around their margin. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 29(1), 41-48.
12. Grajower, R., Zeitchick, A., & Rajstein, J. (1979). The grinding efficiency of diamond burs. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 42(4), 422-428.
13. Harkness, N., & Davies, E. H. (1983). The cleaning of dental diamond burs. Br Dent J, 154(2), 42-45. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4804985
14. Hegde, M. N. (2009). A comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different newer direct composite resins using a self etching primer in class V cavities: An in vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 12(4), 160.
15. ISO, I. (2003). TS 11405: Dental materials—testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization ISO Central Secretariat.
16. Jiménez-Hernández, M. (2022). Evaluation of Dentin Microroughness and Composite Bond Strength After Multiple Uses of Diamond Burs. International journal of dental Sciences, 24(3), 48-60. doi:DOI: 10.15517/IJDS.2022.49286
17. Jiménez-Hernández, M., Chavarría-Bolaños, D., Murillo-Gómez, F., Vega-Baudrit, J., Pozos-Guillén, A., Lafuente-Marín, D., & Montero-Aguilar, M. (2022). Evaluation of dentin microroughness and composite bond strength after multiple uses of diamond burs. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences, 24(3), 48-60.
18. Kasraei, S., Azarsina, M., & Majidi, S. (2011). In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent, 36(2), 213-221. doi:10.2341/10-215-L
19. Kim, E.-J., Lee, K.-B., & Jin, M.-U. (2016). Bulk fill 유동성 복합레진의 변연 누출에서 다른 중합시간의 영향에 대해 마이크로시티를 이용한 평가. Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science, 32(3), 184-193.
20. Malekipour, M. R. (2010). The effect of cutting efficacy of diamond burs on microleakage of class v resin composite restorations using total etch and self etch adhesive systems. J Dent (Tehran), 7(4), 218-225.
21. Malekipour, M. R., Shirani, F., & Tahmourespour, S. (2010). The effect of cutting efficacy of diamond burs on microleakage of class v resin composite restorations using total etch and self etch adhesive systems. J Dent (Tehran), 7(4), 218-225.
22. Mosharrafian, S. (2017). Microleakage of two bulk fill and one conventional composite in class II restorations of primary posterior teeth. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 14(3), 123.
23. Patel, M. C. (2018). Comparative evaluation of marginal seal integrity of three bulk-fill composite materials in Class II cavities: An in vitro study. Advances in Human Biology, 8(3), 201.
24. Roberson, T. (2006). Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry: Elsevier Health Sciences.
25. Shook, L. W. (2003). Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Operative dentistry, 28(6), 779-785.
26. Siegel. (2000). Cutting efficiency of three diamond bur grit sizes. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 131(12), 1706-1710.
27. Synarellis, A. (2017). In vitro microleakage of class V composite restorations prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser and carbide bur. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 21(1), 24-31.
28. Tani, C., & Finger, W. J. (2002). Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 4(4).
29. Vinay, S., & Shivanna, V. (2010). Comparative evaluation of microleakage of fifth, sixth, and seventh generation dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 13(3), 136.
30. von Fraunhofer, J. A., Smith, T. A., & Marshall, K. R. (2005). The effect of multiple uses of disposable diamond burs on restoration leakage. J Am Dent Assoc, 136(1), 53-57; quiz 90. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0026
31. Walsh, J. (1953). Critical review of cutting instruments in cavity preparation: I. diamond stone. Int Dent J, 4(1), 36-43.