تطبيق منهجية التفكير المبني على المخاطر لتحسين الوثوقية والسلامة لطائرة مسيرة صغيرة
الملخص
Small drones are exposed to many risks that affect reliability and safety as a result of technical problems occurring in one or more of their components, which leads to the aircraft failing to carry out its mission, losing it, or crashing into populated areas.
The study aims to evaluate the risks of failure of components of a small drone on reliability and safety, based on the risk-based approach in accordance with the quality management system of the international standard AS9100D for aviation, space and defense sector institutions. Identifying high-risk failure patterns that could lead to catastrophic accidents using the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) approach, and arranging them according to the Risk Priority Number (RPN). And develop procedures to mitigate the risks resulting from the failure of partial systems of aircraft components by using components that are auxiliary to those systems
References
[2] ISO 9001:2015, Quality management systems – Requirements, https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html, visited 16-11-2023
[3] ISO 9001-2008. Quality management systems – Requirements, https://www.iso.org/standard/46486.html, visited 16-11-2023.
[4] ISO 31000-2009. Risk management -- Principles and guidelines, https://www.iso.org/standard/43170.html
[5] Sadraey, M., 2010, September. A systems engineering approach to unmanned aerial vehicle design. In 10th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations (ATIO) conference (p. 9302).
[6] https://monroeengineering.com/assets/AS9100D-Quality-Manual.pdf
[7] Christiansen, R.S., 2004. Design of an autopilot for small unmanned aerial vehicles. Brigham Young University.
[8] Kwan.K, Pothala.D, Abdul Rahim.M, Risley.N; "UAV PROPOSAL: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW DOCUMENTATION", PURDUE UNIVERSITY, 2007.
[9] Freeman, P.M., 2014. Reliability assessment for low-cost unmanned aerial vehicles (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota).
[10] Wang, S., Zhen, Z., Jiang, J. and Wang, X., 2016. Flight tests of autopilot integrated with fault-tolerant control of a small fixed-wing UAV. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016.
[11] Okafor, E.G. and Eze, I.H., 2016. Failure analysis of a UAV flight control system using markov analysis. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 35(1), pp.167-173.
[12] Clothier, R.A., Walker, R.A., Valavanis, K.P. and Vachtsevanos, G.J., 2013. The safety risk management of unmanned aircraft systems. In Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles (p. 37). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+ Business Media BV.
[13] Wackwitz, K. and Boedecker, H., 2015. Safety risk assessment for uav operation. Drone Industry Insights, Safe Airspace Integration Project, Part One, Hamburg, Germany, pp.31-53.
[14] Washington, A., Clothier, R. and Silva, J., 2019, January. Challenges to the risk-based regulation of unmanned aircraft systems. In Proceedings of the 18th Australian International Aerospace Congress (AIAC18) (pp. 26-33). Engineers Australia, Royal Aeronautical Society.
[15] Venkataraman, R., Lukátsi, M., Vanek, B. and Seiler, P., 2015. Reliability assessment of actuator architectures for unmanned aircraft. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(21), pp.398-403.
[16] Logan, M.J. and Glaab, L.J., 2017. Failure mode effects analysis and flight testing for small unmanned aerial systems. In 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. 3270).
[17] Allouch, A., Koubaa, A., Khalgui, M. and Abbes, T., 2019. Qualitative and quantitative risk analysis and safety assessment of unmanned aerial vehicles missions over the internet. Ieee Access, 7, pp.53392-53410.
