An in-Vitro Study to Compare the Shear Strength between Bulk Composite and Fiber Reinforced Bulk Composite"

An in-Vitro Study to Compare the Shear Strength between Bulk Composite and Fiber Reinforced Bulk Composite" Abstract

  • د.ديمة رسلان جامعة حماه
  • Prof. Dr. Atef Abdullah
الكلمات المفتاحية: Bulk composite, Fiber reinforced bulk composite, Polyethylene fibers, Shear strength, Universal testing machine

الملخص

Aim of study: To compare the shear strength between bulk composite and fiber reinforced bulk composite.

Materials and methods: This study included 40 newly extracted upper premolars for orthodontic reasons, were randomly divided into two groups according to the restored material in the following order: Group1 (n=20): Bulk composite (Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar  Vivadent, USA), and Group2 (n=20): Fiber reinforced bulk composite (Polydentia, Switzerland). The cusps were removed from the entire premolars of the sample at a level of  the cementoenamel junction using diamond disc (Horico, Germany) so that the dentin surface became exposed. The premolars were fixed on acrylic molds with fixed dimensions 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm so that the root is embedded in the acrylic mold. A metal mold was made for the research, containing in its center a cylindrical cavity with dimensions: 3 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height, then it was placed on the surfaces of all the samples to compact the resin within the central cavity according to the distribution of the groups. The samples were prepared for testing, then they were transferred to the universal testing machine (Testometric AX 114, Universal Testing Machine), and each of them was subjected to a shear strength test after the moving head of the device was set a speed of 1 mm\ min until failure occurred.   

Results: The values of shear strength in the fiber reinforced bulk composite group were higher than in the bulk composite group.

References

1. Ala'a Al-Haddad. Characterisation and Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations. (2015). Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences. University of Manchester.
2. A. Tezvergil, L.V.J. Lassila, P.K. Vallittu. (2005). The shear bond strength of bidirectional and random-oriented fibre-reinforced composite to tooth structure. Journal of Dentistry, 33: 509-516.
3. Attik N, Colon P, Gauthier R, et al. (2022). Comparison of physical and biological properties of a flowable fiber reinforced and bulk filling composites. Dent Mater, 38(2): 19-30.
4. Alireza Sadr, Behnoush Bakhtiari, Juri Hayashi, Minh N. Luong, Yen-Wei Chen, Grant Chyz, Daniel Chan, Junji Tagami. (2020). Effects of fiber reinforcement on adaptation and bond strength of a bulk-fill composite in deep preparations. Dent Mater, 7(1): 1-8.
5. Alireza Sadr, Omri Margalit, Alexander Palander, Junji Tagami. (2023). Bulk Fill Composites: Adhesion and Interfacial Adaptation. Springer, Cham., 36: 25-37.
6. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. (2008). Effect of fiber-reinforced composite at the interface on bonding of resin core system to dentin. Dent Mater J, 27: 736-778.
7. Dejan Peric, Jovana Ruzic, Steva Levic, Jovana N. Stasic. (2022). Polymer characteristics and mechanical properties of bulk-fill, giomer, fiber-reinforced, and low-shrinkage composites. Srp Arh Celok Lek, 150 (7-8): 414-420.
8. Ellyza Herda, Lulu Sharfina, Anggia Nadya Andjani, Mia Damiyanti, Bambang Irawan. (2017). Light-Curing Distance and Resin Thickness Effects on The Short Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composites' Depth of Cure. Int J App Pharm, 9(2): 27.
9. Ensaff H, O'Doherty DM, Jacobcen PH. (2001). The influence of the restoration-tooth interface in light cured composite restorations: a finite element analysis. Biomater, 22: 3097-3200.
10. Ergun G, Cekic I, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. (2006). Bonding of lithium-disilicate ceramic to enamel and dentin using orthotropic fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Acta Odontol Scand, 64: 293-301.
11. Fahad I Alkhudairy, Zeeshan. (2016). Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Various Bulk-fill Bioactive Dentin substitutes: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 17(12): 997-1002.
12. Faria-E-Silva AL, Fabiao MM, Sfalcin RA, et al. (2009). Bond strength of one-step adhesives under different substrate moisture conditions. Eur J Dent, 3: 290-295.
13. Garoushi S, Gargoum A, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. (2018). Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: a review of the current literature. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 9(3): 123-152.
14. Gul Keskin, Zubeyde Ucar-Gundogar, Gun Burak Tek. (2021). Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Bulk-Fill and Fiber-Reinforced Composites in Class II Cavities. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences, 23(2): 2215-3411.
15. Hubsch PF, Middleton J, Knox J. (2000). A finite element analysis of the stress at the restoration-tooth interface, comparing inlays and bulk fillings. Biomater, 21: 1015-1023.
16. Jasmina Bijelic-Donova, Sufyan Garoushi, Lippo V. J. Lassila, Filip Keulemans, Pekka K. Vallittu. (2016). Mechanical and structural characterization of discontinuous fiber-reinforced dental resin composite. Journal of Dentistry, 2645: 1-9.
17. Jonathan C. Meiers, Reza B. Kazemi, Marco Donadio. (2003). The influence of fiber reinforced of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel. J Prosthet Dent, 89: 388-93.
18. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. (2001). Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater, 17: 122-127.
19. L. Lassila, J. Tuokko, A. Suni, S. Garoushi, P. K. Vallittu. (2022). Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite. BIOMATERIAL INVESTIGATIONS IN DENTISTRY, 9(1): 33-40.
20. Mennatallah Naguib Salem, Omaima Hassan Ghallab, Mohamed Nasser Anwar, Dina Wafik Elkassas. (2022). Effect of Different Formulations of Dentin Replacement Materials and Aging on the Flexural Strength of the Overlying Resin Composite. JDMT, 11: 19-27.
21. Molnar J, Frater M, Sary T, et al. (2022). Fatigue performance of endodontically treated molars restored with different dentin replacement materials. Dent Mater, 38: 83-93.
22. Nihan Gonulol, Sezin Ozer, Emine Sen Tunc. (2016). Effect of a third-generation LED LCU on microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Int J Paediatr Dent, 26(5): 376-82.
23. Nurcan Ilday, Nilgun Seven. (2011). The influence of different fiber-reinforced composites on shear bond strengths when bonded to enamel and dentin structures. Journal of Dental Sciences, 6: 107-115.
24. Ravula A Reddy, RS Basavanna. (2016). Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Fiber-reinforced Composite and Methacrylate-based Composite to Pure Tricalcium-based Cement. CODS Journal of Dentistry, 8(1): 25-27.
25. Sema Belli, Nazmiye Donmez, Gurcan Eskitascioglu. (2006). The Effect of C-factor and Flowable Resin or Fiber Use at the Interface on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin. J Adhes Dent, 8: 247-253.
26. Shiva Jafarnia, Alireza Valanezhad, Sima Shahabi, Shigeaki Abe, and Ikuya Watanabe. (2021). Physical and mechanical characteristics of short fiber-reinforced resin composite in comparison with bulk-fill composites. Journal of Oral Science, 20: 1-4.
27. Sufyan Garoushi, Filip Keulemans, Lippo Lassila, Pekka K. Vallittu. (2023). Short Fiber Based Filling Composites. Springer, Cham., 43: 81-96.
28. Tanner J, Tolvanen M, Garoushi S, Sailynoja E. (2018). Clinical Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth-Results of 2-5 Year Follow-up. Open Dent J, 12: 476-485.
29. Tarek A. Omran, Sufyan Garoushi, Aous A. Abdulmajeed, Lippo V. Lassila, Pekka K. Vallittu. (2017). Influence of increment thickness on dentin bond strength and light transmission of composite base materials. Clin Oral Invest, 21: 1717-1724.
30. Weam Douidar, Abdallah F. Elsadany, Asmaa M. Abdallah. (2022). Effect of Thermal Aging on Hardness and Modulus of Elasticity of Different Dental Resin Composites: An in Vitro Study. E.D.J., 68(1): 1004-1012.
منشور
2024-03-06
How to Cite
رسلاند., & Prof. Dr. Atef Abdullah. (2024). An in-Vitro Study to Compare the Shear Strength between Bulk Composite and Fiber Reinforced Bulk Composite". Journal of Hama University , 7(2). Retrieved from https://hama-univ.edu.sy/ojs/index.php/huj/article/view/1729