Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel Effect on Bond Strength of Composite to Enamel and Dentine of Primary Teeth after Salivary Contamination Following the Application Stage of the Bonding Material ( In-Vitro Study)
الكلمات المفتاحية:
: Sodium hypochlorite, Composite, Primary teeth enamel, Primary teeth dentine, Bonding strength.
الملخص
The aim of this research was to investigate the effect of sodium hypochlorite gel application on bond strength of composite to enamel of primary teeth after salivary contamination following the application stage of the bonding material.
Methods: The sample included 50 recently extracted primary human teeth. The sample was randomly distributed into 5 groups:
The control group (A), included 10 primary teeth, composites were applied in the traditional manner without any salivary contamination. The second group (B) consisted of 10 primary teeth, where salivary contamination was applied after the application of bonding material, rebonding and followed by the application of composite. The third group (C) included 10 primary teeth, which salivary contamination was applied after the application of bonding material, drying and followed by the application of composite. The fourth group (D) included 10 primary teeth, which salivary contamination was applied after the application of bonding material, application of sodium hypochlorite gel and followed by the application of composite. The fifth group (E) included 10 primary teeth, which salivary contamination was applied after the application of bonding material, application of sodium hypochlorite solution and followed by the application of composite.
Results: It was observed that the mean bonding strength values for the enamel groups in the research sample were as follows:
(A=13.36 Mpa)> (C=11.80 Mpa) >(E=8.22 Mpa) >(D=7.42 Mpa)> (B=5.74 Mpa)
Conclusion: We conclude that the application of sodium hypochlorite gel after salivary contamination decrease the composite bonding strength to enamel teeth.
References
1. Demarco, Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dental materials. 2012. 28(1): p. 87-101.
2. Brudevold, A preliminary study of posteruptive maturation of teeth in situ. Caries research, 1982. 16(3): p. 243-8.
3. Kotsanos, Influence of posteruptive age of enamel on its susceptibility to artificial caries. Caries research, 1991. 25(4): p. 241-50.
4. Nordenvall, Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth. A comparision between 15 and 60
seconds of etching. Am J Orthod, 1980. 78(1): p. 99-108.
5. Hasija, P., Deproteinizing Agents as an Effective Enamel Bond Enhancer- An in Vitro Study. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2017. (41): p. 280-282.
6. Ercan, Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal:
In vivo study. J Endod, 2004. 30(2): p. 84-87.
7. Grandini, Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant. J Endod., 2002. 28(4): p. 300-303.
8. Venezie, Enamel pretreatment with sodium hypochlorite to enhance bonding in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: case report and SEM analysis. Pediatr Dent, 1994. 16(6): p. 433-436.
9. Mohammadi, Z., Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. International dental journal, 2008. 58(6): p. 329-341.
10. Biel, Interactions between the tetrasodium salts of EDTA and 1-hydroxyethane 1, 1-diphosphonic acid with sodium hypochlorite irrigants. Journal of endodontics, 2017. 43(4): p. 657-661.
11. Spencer, the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics—potential complications and their management. British dental journal, 2007. 202(9): p. 555-559.
12. Estrela, C., et al., Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Brazilian dental journal, 2002. 13: p. 113-117.
13. Perdigão, Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dental Materials, 2000. 16(5): p. 311-323.
14. Ganesh, Evaluation of nanoleakage following deproteinization of dentin using varying concentrations and application times of sodium hypochlorite solution and gel-an in vitro confocal laser scanning microscope study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 2005. 8(1): p. 27.
15. Paul, Nanoleakage at the dentin adhesive interface vs. microtensile bond strength. Operative Dentistry, 2000. 25: p. 40_5.
16. Nascimento, A.L.d., et al., Residues of different gel formulations on dentinal walls: A SEM/EDS analysis. Microscopy research and technique, 2015. 78(6): p. 495-499.
17. Jurczyk, K., In-vitro activity of sodium-hypochlorite gel on bacteria associated with periodontitis. Clinical oral investigations, 2016. 20(8): p. 2165-2173.
18. Elkassas, D., Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2016. 10: p. 327-32.
19. Korkmaz, The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations. European journal of dentistry, 2013. 7(S 01): p. S033-S040.
20. القيسي, أ., تقييم تأثير هلام هيبوكلوريت الصوديوم في قوة ارتباط الكمبوزيت بعد التلوث اللعابي بميناء وعاج الأسنان المؤقتة_دراسة مخبرية 2020.
21. Godoy-Bezerra, Shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with saliva present and different enamel pretreatments. The Angle Orthodontist, 2006. 76(3): p. 470-474.
22. Edgar, W., Saliva: its secretion, composition and functions. British dental journal, 1992. 172(8): p. 305-312.
23. Hosoya, Y., et al., Resin adhesion on the primary ground enamel.(2) Influence of the etched enamel. Shoni Shikagaku zasshi. The Japanese Journal of Pedodontics, 1990. 28(4): p. 907-917.
24. Marcos, R.M.H.-C., et al., Influence of the resin cement thickness on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts. Brazilian dental journal, 2016. 27: p. 592-598.
25. De Munck, J.d., et al., A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of dental research, 2005. 84(2): p. 118-132.
26. Rekha, Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement and compomer: An in vitro study. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 2012. 3(3): p. 282.
27. Moezzyzadeh, M., Evaluation of the compressive strength of hybrid and nanocomposites. 2012.
28. Fakhri, Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self-etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Pediatric dentistry, 2009. 31(4): p. 334-339.
29. Shih, Effects of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to primary teeth dentin. Journal of Dental Sciences, 2006. 1(3): p. 101-106.
30. خوري, ن., تقييم هيبوكلو ريت الصوديوم على التسرب الحفافي لحشوات الراتنج المركب . في الأسنان المؤقتة(دراسة مخبرية)". مطبوعات جامعة دمشق. 2013.
31. Malekafzali, Comparison of microtensile bond strength of a resin composite to enamel conditioned by acid etching and Er, Cr: YSGG laser in human primary teeth. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2015. 16(1): p. 57-62.
32. Bahrololoomi, The effect of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation and Different cocentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on shear bond strength of composite to primary teeth's dentin. . J Lasers Med Sci 2017. 8(1): p. 29-35.
33. Furuse, Bond strength of resin-resin interfaces contaminated with saliva and submitted to different surface treatments. J Appl Oral Sci, 2007. 15: p. 501-5.
34. Poggio, Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite-based irrigating solutions. Int. J. Artif, 2010. 33: p. 654–659.
35. Lee, Effect of food and oral simulating fluids on structure of adhesive composite systems. J Dent., 1995. 23: p. 27-35.
36. Nima, G., Effects of sodium hypochlorite as dentin deproteinizing agent and aging media on bond strength of two conventional adhesives. 2020.
2. Brudevold, A preliminary study of posteruptive maturation of teeth in situ. Caries research, 1982. 16(3): p. 243-8.
3. Kotsanos, Influence of posteruptive age of enamel on its susceptibility to artificial caries. Caries research, 1991. 25(4): p. 241-50.
4. Nordenvall, Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth. A comparision between 15 and 60
seconds of etching. Am J Orthod, 1980. 78(1): p. 99-108.
5. Hasija, P., Deproteinizing Agents as an Effective Enamel Bond Enhancer- An in Vitro Study. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2017. (41): p. 280-282.
6. Ercan, Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal:
In vivo study. J Endod, 2004. 30(2): p. 84-87.
7. Grandini, Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant. J Endod., 2002. 28(4): p. 300-303.
8. Venezie, Enamel pretreatment with sodium hypochlorite to enhance bonding in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: case report and SEM analysis. Pediatr Dent, 1994. 16(6): p. 433-436.
9. Mohammadi, Z., Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. International dental journal, 2008. 58(6): p. 329-341.
10. Biel, Interactions between the tetrasodium salts of EDTA and 1-hydroxyethane 1, 1-diphosphonic acid with sodium hypochlorite irrigants. Journal of endodontics, 2017. 43(4): p. 657-661.
11. Spencer, the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics—potential complications and their management. British dental journal, 2007. 202(9): p. 555-559.
12. Estrela, C., et al., Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Brazilian dental journal, 2002. 13: p. 113-117.
13. Perdigão, Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dental Materials, 2000. 16(5): p. 311-323.
14. Ganesh, Evaluation of nanoleakage following deproteinization of dentin using varying concentrations and application times of sodium hypochlorite solution and gel-an in vitro confocal laser scanning microscope study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 2005. 8(1): p. 27.
15. Paul, Nanoleakage at the dentin adhesive interface vs. microtensile bond strength. Operative Dentistry, 2000. 25: p. 40_5.
16. Nascimento, A.L.d., et al., Residues of different gel formulations on dentinal walls: A SEM/EDS analysis. Microscopy research and technique, 2015. 78(6): p. 495-499.
17. Jurczyk, K., In-vitro activity of sodium-hypochlorite gel on bacteria associated with periodontitis. Clinical oral investigations, 2016. 20(8): p. 2165-2173.
18. Elkassas, D., Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2016. 10: p. 327-32.
19. Korkmaz, The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations. European journal of dentistry, 2013. 7(S 01): p. S033-S040.
20. القيسي, أ., تقييم تأثير هلام هيبوكلوريت الصوديوم في قوة ارتباط الكمبوزيت بعد التلوث اللعابي بميناء وعاج الأسنان المؤقتة_دراسة مخبرية 2020.
21. Godoy-Bezerra, Shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with saliva present and different enamel pretreatments. The Angle Orthodontist, 2006. 76(3): p. 470-474.
22. Edgar, W., Saliva: its secretion, composition and functions. British dental journal, 1992. 172(8): p. 305-312.
23. Hosoya, Y., et al., Resin adhesion on the primary ground enamel.(2) Influence of the etched enamel. Shoni Shikagaku zasshi. The Japanese Journal of Pedodontics, 1990. 28(4): p. 907-917.
24. Marcos, R.M.H.-C., et al., Influence of the resin cement thickness on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts. Brazilian dental journal, 2016. 27: p. 592-598.
25. De Munck, J.d., et al., A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of dental research, 2005. 84(2): p. 118-132.
26. Rekha, Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement and compomer: An in vitro study. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 2012. 3(3): p. 282.
27. Moezzyzadeh, M., Evaluation of the compressive strength of hybrid and nanocomposites. 2012.
28. Fakhri, Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self-etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Pediatric dentistry, 2009. 31(4): p. 334-339.
29. Shih, Effects of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to primary teeth dentin. Journal of Dental Sciences, 2006. 1(3): p. 101-106.
30. خوري, ن., تقييم هيبوكلو ريت الصوديوم على التسرب الحفافي لحشوات الراتنج المركب . في الأسنان المؤقتة(دراسة مخبرية)". مطبوعات جامعة دمشق. 2013.
31. Malekafzali, Comparison of microtensile bond strength of a resin composite to enamel conditioned by acid etching and Er, Cr: YSGG laser in human primary teeth. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2015. 16(1): p. 57-62.
32. Bahrololoomi, The effect of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation and Different cocentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on shear bond strength of composite to primary teeth's dentin. . J Lasers Med Sci 2017. 8(1): p. 29-35.
33. Furuse, Bond strength of resin-resin interfaces contaminated with saliva and submitted to different surface treatments. J Appl Oral Sci, 2007. 15: p. 501-5.
34. Poggio, Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite-based irrigating solutions. Int. J. Artif, 2010. 33: p. 654–659.
35. Lee, Effect of food and oral simulating fluids on structure of adhesive composite systems. J Dent., 1995. 23: p. 27-35.
36. Nima, G., Effects of sodium hypochlorite as dentin deproteinizing agent and aging media on bond strength of two conventional adhesives. 2020.
منشور
2024-02-28
How to Cite
المبيضد. ز., & Dr. Reem Al Fares. (2024). Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel Effect on Bond Strength of Composite to Enamel and Dentine of Primary Teeth after Salivary Contamination Following the Application Stage of the Bonding Material ( In-Vitro Study). Journal of Hama University , 6(18). Retrieved from https://hama-univ.edu.sy/ojs/index.php/huj/article/view/1513
القسم
Dentistry
