studying the effect of fabrication technique of metal core on the Retention prosthesis
الملخص
The success of prosthodontics depends on several things, the most important of which is the permanence of the compensation, which naturally depends on retention and resistance . And because metal-ceramic prostheses are still the most common and used prosthodontics in clinical terms, and due to the development of the techniques used in the manufacture of prosthodontics, it was necessary to test these new techniques to find out the real feasibility in testing stability.
Comparison of the retention of a metal substructure using different fabrication techniques.
A model was designed in the form of a tooth prepared for an upper first premolar with dimensions of 5 mm height and a chamfer finish line of 0.5 mm with occlusal wall convergence of 12 degrees. 30 main examples were manufactured by 3D printer and divided into 3 equal groups, then 10 metal core were manufactured by each method (traditional method, 3D printing method, milled wax lost wax) and cementation them by glass ionomer cement (VOCO-MERON). The test was carried out by a tensile strength measuring device located in the Industrial Research Center at the Ministry of Industry.
The study showed that there are no statistically significant differences in the retention test between the manufacturing methods (traditional method, 3D printing method, milled wax lost wax) at the confidence level (0.05), and therefore any of the three methods can be used clinically.
References
2. Shillingburg, H. T., Hobo, S., Whitsett, L. D., Jacobi, R., & Brackett, S. E. (1997). Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics (Vol. 194). Chicago, IL, USA: Quintessence Publishing Company.
3. Lövgren, N., Roxner, R., Klemendz, S., & Larsson, C. (2017). Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 118(1), 95-101.
4. Gunsoy, S., & Ulusoy, M. (2016). Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 19(5), 636-644.
5. Park, J. K., Lee, W. S., Kim, H. Y., Kim, W. C., & Kim, J. H. (2015). Accuracy evaluation of metal copings fabricated by computer-aided milling and direct metal laser sintering systems. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 7(2), 122-128.
6. Kihara, H., Hatakeyama, W., Komine, F., Takafuji, K., Takahashi, T., Yokota, J., ... & Kondo, H. (2020). Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. Journal of prosthodontic research, 64(2), 109-113.
7. Ates, S. M., & Yesil Duymus, Z. (2016). Influence of Tooth Preparation Design on Fitting Accuracy of CAD‐CAM Based Restorations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 28(4), 238-246.
8. Tamac, E., Toksavul, S., & Toman, M. (2014). Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 112(4), 909-913.
9. Harish, V., SA, M. A., Jagadesan, N., Ifthikar, M., Senthil, S., Basak, D., & Huda, F. (2014). Evaluation of internal and marginal fit of two metal ceramic system–in vitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR, 8(12), ZC53.
10. Chang, H. S., Peng, Y. T., Hung, W. L., & Hsu, M. L. (2019). Evaluation of marginal adaptation of CoCrMo metal crowns fabricated by traditional method and computer-aided technologies. Journal of dental sciences, 14(3), 288-294.
11. Gunsoy, S., & Ulusoy, M. (2016). Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 19(5), 636-644.
12. Huang, Z., Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Zhang, X. (2015). Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 113(6), 623-627.
13. Sundar, M. K., Chikmagalur, S. B., & Pasha, F. (2014). Marginal fit and microleakage of cast and metal laser sintered copings—An in vitro study. Journal of prosthodontic research, 58(4), 252-258.
14. Hong, M. H., Min, B. K., Lee, D. H., & Kwon, T. Y. (2019). Marginal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated by using a casting and two selective laser melting processes before and after ceramic firing. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(5), 475-481.
15. Van Noort, R. (2012). The future of dental devices is digital. Dental materials, 28(1), 3-12.
16. Bae, S., Hong, M. H., Lee, H., Lee, C. H., Hong, M., Lee, J., & Lee, D. H. (2020). Reliability of metal 3D printing with respect to the marginal fit of fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials, 13(21), 4781.
17. Quante, K., Ludwig, K., & Kern, M. (2008). Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dental Materials, 24(10), 1311-1315.
18. Yau, H. T., Yang, T. J., & Lin, Y. K. (2016). Comparison of 3-D Printing and 5-axis Milling for the Production of Dental e-models from Intra-oral Scanning. Computer-aided design and applications, 13(1), 32-38.
19. Jeong, Y. G., Lee, W. S., & Lee, K. B. (2018). Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 10(3), 245-251.
20. O'Kray, H., Marshall, T. S., & Braun, T. M. (2012). Supplementing retention through crown/preparation modification: An in vitro study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 107(3), 186-190.
21. Tasaka, A., Shimizu, T., Ito, K., Wadachi, J., Odaka, K., & Yamashita, S. (2022). Digital technology for fabrication of removable dental prosthesis with double crowns combining fiber-reinforced composite and zirconia. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, JPR_D_22_00064.
