Analyze Asymmetric Cost Behavior “An Applied Study on the Industrial Companies Listed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange”

  • Hanadi Othman Tishreen University
  • *Iyad Malik Hatem
الكلمات المفتاحية: Keywords: Asymmetric Cost Behavior, Symmetric Cost Behavior, Sticky Cost, Cost Behavior Analysis

الملخص

The research aimed to measure and analyze the behavior of each of the cost of goods sold, total marketing, administrative and general costs, and operational costs in the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange.
The statistical population of the research was represented by the industrial companies listed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Market, which numbered (21) industrial companies, and due to the lack of data available for the entire statistical community during the period from 2014 to 2021, the current research was limited to (9) industrial companies. The secondary data related to the research variables were obtained from the income statement of the companies using the model of Anderson et al. (2003), and analyzed it based on the method of ordinary least squares (OLS) through the SPSS.V.25 statistical package program.
The results of the research showed that each of the cost of goods sold and operating costs behaved asymmetrically and Sticky, Where costs increased by (62.8%) and (63.9%), respectively, when sales revenue increased by 1%, while they decreased by (35%), ( 38.6%, respectively, when sales revenue decreased by 1%, The research also found that the Stickiness of each of the cost of goods sold and operating costs increased at a low level of debt intensity and a high level of company size, while no effect was found for asset intensity and free cash flow rate on the behavior of each of the cost of goods sold and operating costs.

References

11. المراجع
مغيض، براق عوض محمود؛ العيسى، ياسين أحمد. (2017). تحليل سلوك التكاليف اللزجة: دراسة استقصائية على الشركات الصناعية المدرجة في سوق عمان المالي.المجلة الأردنية لإدارة الأعمال،13(4)
Abdullah, A. A. H. (2021). Cost stickiness and firm profitability: A study in Saudi Arabian industries. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 18(3), 327-333.
Abu-Serdaneh, J., (2014). The Asymmetrical Behaviour of Cost: Evidence from Jordan, International Business Research. 7 (8), 113-122.
Ali, H., Shafique, O., Khizar, H. M. U., Jamal, W. N., & Sarwar, S. (2021). Corporate Governance and Determinants of Cost Asymmetric Behavior: Evidence from Pakistan. Palarch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 18(1), 984-1008
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003, March). Are Selling, General, & Administrative Costs ―Sticky‖? Journal of Accounting Research. 41 (1), 47-63
Cannon, J. N. 2014. Determinants of ‘Sticky Costs': An Analysis of Cost Behavior using United States Air Transportation Industry Data. Accounting Review. 89 (5):1645-1672.
Ezat, Amr Nazieh Mahmoud, (2014). Corporate Governance Ownership Structure and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Egypt. The Egyptian Journal off Business Studies, Mansoura University, 4(38), 27-78.
Guenther, T. W., Riehl, A., & Rößler, R., (2014). Cost Stickiness: State of the Art of Research and Implications. Journal of Management Control. 24, 301-318.
Hussien, L., & Zurelegat, Q., & Zragat, O. (2021). Explanatory Factors for Asymmetric Cost Behaviour: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Innovation. 15(4), 201-219
‏ Ibrahim, A. E. A. (2015). Economic Growth and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. ‏ 13(1), 119-140.
Ibrahim, A. and Ezat, A. (2017). Sticky Cost Behavior: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 7(1), 16-34
Kama, I., And Weiss, D., (2013), “Do Earnings Targets And Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs? ”, Journal Of Accounting Research. 51(1), 201–224.
Kuang, J.,& Alfaysa, R. (2021). Cost Stickiness in Sweden. Master Thesis. Uppsala University: Sweden
Noreen, E., and Soderstrom, N. (1994), Are Overhead Costs Strictly Proportional to Activity?: Evidence From Hospital Departments. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2): 255–278
Pamplona, E., Fiirst, C., Silva, T. B. D. J., & Zonatto, V. C. D. S. (2016). Sticky Costs In Cost Behavior Of The Largest Companies In Brazil, Chile And Mexico. Contaduría y administración. 61(4), 682-704
Templeton, G. F. (2011). A two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: implications and recommendations for IS research. Communications of the association for information systems, 28(1), 41-58
Walid, T. (2021). Cost Stickiness: Analysis and Determinants. Case Study of Saudi Companies. Theoretical Economics Letters. 11, 239-248. Https://Doi.Org/10.4236/Tel.2021.112017
Weiss, D. (2010). Cost Behaviour and Analysts’ Earnings Forecast. The Accounting Review. 85(4), 1441-1471
Yasukata, K. (2011). Are 'Sticky Costs' the Result of Deliberate Decision of Managers?. Available at SSRN 1444746.‏
Zulfiati, L., Gusliana, R., & Nuridah, S. (2020, March). Cost Stickiness: Behavior and Factors. In Annual International Conference on Accounting Research (AICAR 2019) (pp. 143-145). Atlantis Press.
منشور
2024-02-20
How to Cite
Othman, H., & *Iyad Malik Hatem. (2024). Analyze Asymmetric Cost Behavior “An Applied Study on the Industrial Companies Listed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange”. Journal of Hama University , 6(7). Retrieved from https://hama-univ.edu.sy/ojs/index.php/huj/article/view/1427