الملخص
A good apical sealing is the key of the successful endodontic treatment. Therefore , the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the ERRM sealing ability in Apicoectomy when it's done in different angles (Oblique Cutting and Perpendicular Cutting Planes) and the next healing , In vitro study: 20 extracted human teeth with straight roots were instrumented and obturated,the samples divided into 2 groups based on the cutting angle of the apex, 3 mm of the root apex resected and retrograde preparations of 3mm were made using ultrasonic retro tips The cavities filled with ERRM ,cross sections were made and examined under the light Microscope, In vevo study 20 anterior single rooted teeth were referred to perform Apicoectomy, divided into 2 groups based on the cutting angle of the apex, ERRM was used to retro fill the apex , and the samples followed up to 12 months The results In vivo study showed at the confidence level of 95%, there are no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of the degree of healing variable between the two groups, The results In vitro study showed at the confidence level of 95%, there are no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of the variable degree of dye permeability between the two research groups So, paying attention to the procedural steps when performing the Apicoectomy leads to good outcomes for the surgical treatment Whether the comparisons were made, cutting apex at an angle perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the root would lead to healing and treatment success With an emphasis on the importance of securing a good workspace that facilitates the practitioner to conduct debridement of the entire bony cavity
References
2) EVA MARTI-BOWEN, M. P. 2006. An update in periapical surgery. Med Oral Path Oral Cir Bucal, 503-9.
3) GUTMANN , J., HARRISON JW. 1994. Surgical endodontics, vol. St. Louis. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, 468.
4) GAGLIANI, M., TASCHIERI, S. & MOLINARI, R. 1998. Ultrasonic root-end preparation: influence of cutting angle on the apical seal. J Endod, 24, 726-30.
5) HENCH, L. L. 1991. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. Journal of the american ceramic society, 74, 1487-1510.
6) KOCH, K. B., D. 2009. The increased use of bioceramics in endodontics. Dentaltown, 33-43.
7) KIM S, K. S. 2006. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. Journal of Endodontics, 32, 601–623.
8) LIN S, P. O., METZGER Z, TSESIS I 2008. Residual bacteria in root apices removed by a diagonal root-end resection: a histopathological evaluation. International Endodontic Journal, 41, 469–475.
9) LINDEBOOM JA, F. J., KROON FH, VAN DEN AKKER HP 2005. A comparative prospective randomized clinical study of MTA and IRM as root-end filling materials in single-rooted teeth in endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 100, 495-500.
10) MEECHAN J.G, G. M., MOORE U.J, THOMSON P.J, BROOK I.M & SMITH K.G. 2007. Chapter7: Surgical Endodontics. Minor oral surgery in dental practice., 59-72.
11) MARTÍNEZ-GONZÁLEZ JM, D. M. L. E. C. B. E. D. M. C. B. P. Y. T. 1990. Madrid: Ed. . Masson, 799-176.
12) MORGAN LA, M. J. 1999. A scanning electron microscopic study of in vivo ultrasonic root-end preparations. J Endod, 25, 567.
13) MAUGER MJ, S. W., WALKER WA 3RD. 1998. An evaluation of canal morphology at different levels of root resection in mandibular incisors. J Endod, 24, 607.
14) PINEDA, F., KUTTLE 1972. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol, 23, 101–110.
15) SCHÄFER, E., DIEZ, C., HOPPE, W., TEPEL, J. 2002. Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth. J. Endod, 28, 211-216.
16) SULLIVAN , J., PILEGGI R, AND VARELLA C. 2009. Evaluation of Root-End Resections Performed by Er, Cr: YSGG Laser with and without Placement of a Root-End Filling Material. International Journal of Dentistry, 7, 798-786.
17) TSESIS I, R. E., SCHWARTZ-ARAD D, FUSS Z. 2006. Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique. J Endod, 32, 412-416.
18) Torabinejad, Mahmoud et al. “Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review.” Journal of endodontics vol. 35,7 (2009): 930-7. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.023
19) TIDMARSH BG, A. M. 1989. Dentinal tubules at the root ends of apisected teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J, 22.
20) VERÍSSIMO, D. M. D. V., M. S. 2006. Methodologies for assessment of apical and coronal leakage of endodontic filling materials: a critical review. Journal of oral science, 48, 93-98.
21) VERTUCCI F, R. J. 2005. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod., 10, 3–29.
22) VON ARX T ET AL 2011. Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome. The Saudi Dental Journal, 23, 9-15.
23) WESTON , G., MOULE AJ, BARTOLD PM. 1999. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root surfaces and the guttapercha interface following root-end resection in vitro. Int Endod J, 32, 450.
1-الحلبية , ح., الأستاذ الدكتور حسان الحلبية 2018. مداواة الأسنان اللبية 1. حماه جامعة منشورات, المجلد الثاني 406.
2-البني.ركاب , ا. ا. ا. ص., الأستاذ الدكتور ركاب . محمد سالم 1998. مداواة الأسنان اللبية (الجزء النظري : علوم أساسية - البحث عن المعرفة ). منشورات جامعة البعث , كلية طب الأسنان الفصل السابع ص 149 - 182.