الملخص
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Ferric Sulphate (FS) in success of pulpotomy on primary teeth comparing with Formocresol(FC) by clinical and radiographic observation at (3,6,12) months. A total of 20 children aged (4-9) years having 40 first and second upper and lower molars were selected for traditional pulpotomy treatment, the teeth were divided randomly to be treated with either FC or FS, after the administration of anesthesia and isolation with the rubber dam, a routine pulpotomy was performed, and then application either FC or FS 15.5% (Astringedent®) techniques on radical pulp then a layer of ZOE was placed, then a base layer of zinc phosphate cement, teeth were finally restored by stainless steel crowns. Children were observed for (3, 6, 12) months. After follow-up periods ranging from 3-12 months the clinical success for FC and FS was (90%) in both groups. The radiographic success was 75% for FC and 80% for FS This study revealed at significance level 95% (P≤0.05) that the differences between the results of success of FS and FC were not statistically significant after (3,6,12) months. FS can be used as an alternative agent to FC on pulpotomy of primary molars.
References
1- RANLY, D. M. & GARCIA-GODOY, F. 1991. Reviewing pulp treatment for primary teeth. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 122, 83-85.
2- Rule D.C. And Patel S. “Endodontics in children” In Harthy’s Endodontics In Clinical Practice 4th Ed. Bath Press 1997:P.191.
3- Fuks ABKA, Guelmann M.2013. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: al C, editor. Pediatric dentistry infancy through adolescence. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; . pp. 333–51
4- Guidelines (2008). “Guideline On Pulp Therapy For Primary and Young Permanent Teeth” Pediatr Dent 30(7 Suppl): 170-4
5- WINTERS, J., CAMERON, A. C. & WIDMER, R. P. 2013. Pulp
therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Handbook of Pediatric Dentistry (Fourth Edition). Elsevier World Health Organization. Formaldehyde. Environmental Health Criteria 89, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, 1989.
6- Guidelines (2011),American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. “Guidelines On Pulp Therapy for Primary and Young Permanent Teeth”. Paediatr Dent;33:212-9.
7-WATERHOUSE, P. 1995. Formocresol and alternative primary molar pulpotomy medicaments: a review. Dental Traumatology, 11, 157-162
8- Arnold R. Martin. Anti-Infective Agents, Chap 7 In ( Wilson and Gisvold's Textbook of Organic Mediciol and pharmaceutical Chemistry), Lippincott- Raven, 1998 : 175_177.
9- Actoren ,O. Ferric sulfate, Glutar aldehyde and Formocresol Pulpotomies in Primary teeth, J. Dent Res, 1998:77.
10- RANLY, D. M., GARCIA‐GODOY, F. & HORN, D. 1988. A comparison of the effects of cresol and eugenol on bovine pulp. Dental Traumatology, 4, 70-75
11- RUBY, J. D., COX, C. F., MITCHELL, S. C., MAKHIJA, S., CHOMPU‐INWAI, P. & JACKSON J. 2013.A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. International journal of paediatric dentistry, 23, 145-152.
12- Milnes, A. R. (2006). Persuasive evidence that formocresol use in pediatric dentistry is safe. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 72(3)
13-World Health Organization. Formaldehyde. Environmental Health Criteria 89, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, 1989.
14- Smith, N. L, Seale N. S, et al "Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: a retrospective study. " Pediatr Dent 22(3), 2000: 192-9.
15- Ibricevic, H. and Q. Al-Jame " Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow - up study." Eur J Paediatr Dent 4(1), 2003: 28-32. 5
16- Sonmez, D., S. Sari, et al. (2008). "A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up." J Endod 34(8): 950-5.
17- Fei, A. L., Udin, R. D. "A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth." Pediatr Dent, (1991). 3(6): 327-32.
18- 7- LANDAU,M.J; JOHNSON,D.C. Pulpal response to ferric sulfate in monkeys. J.Dental.research.67:215 abstr,no 822,1988.
19- Aktoren O. and Gencay K.” A two year clinical radiographic follow-up of the pulpotomies in primary molars” J Dent Res, 2000; 79: 543(abstract).
20- ERDEM, A. P., GUVEN, Y., BALLI, B., ILHAN, B., SEPET, E., ULUKAPI, I. & AKTOREN, O. 2011. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study. Pediatric dentistry, 33, 165-170
21- Dean, J. A. (2016). Treatment of deep caries, vital pulp exposure, and pulpless teeth. In McDonald and Avery's Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent (Tenth Edition) (pp. 221-242
22- McDonald. R.E, Avery, D.R, And Dean, J.A. " Treatment of deep caries, vital pulp exposure, and pulpess teeth" . InEds.McDonald,R.E, R.E, and Avery D.R, Dentistry for the child and adolescent . (Ninth edition), St. Louis, the C.V Mosby Co. 2011:343365.
23- ANSARI, G., MOROVATI, S. P. & ASGARY, S. 2018. Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iranian Endodontic Journal, 1, 7-12.
24- مسلماني وليد , "تقييم نجاح بتر اللب بالإسمنت البورتلاندي على الأرحاء المؤقتة" , رسالة ماجستير , جامعة دمشق , 2015 .
25- قبش خالد ، دراسة سريرية مقارنة بين الفورموكريزول والغلوتار ألدهيد في بتر اللب على الأسنان المؤقتة، رسالة ماجستير ، جامعة دمشق ، 2001.
26- لفلوف مهند. مقارنة بين بتر اللب بالفورموكريزول مع بتر اللب بالتخثير الكهربائي وبسلفات الحديد، رسالة ماجستير، جامعة دمشق، 1999.
28- SUSHYNSKI, J. M., ZEALAND, C. M., BOTERO, T. M., BOYNTON, J. R., MAJEWSKI, R. F., SHELBURNE, C. E. & HU, J. C. 2012. Comparison of gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a 6-to 24-month observation. Pediatric dentistry, 34, 120E-128E.
29- JUNEJA, P. & KULKARNI, S. 2017. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 18, 271-278
30- شفا عمري أحمد."تأثير بعض الحشوات القاعدية على نجاح بتر اللب بكبريتات الحديدي على الأرحاء المؤقتة" رسالة ماجستير، جامعة دمشق، 2014
31- Agamy, H, Bakrry. N, Avery D, " Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth" Pediatr dent vol.26, No.4, 2004.
32- Markovic, D., V. Zivojinovic, et al. (2005). "Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth." Eur J Paediatr Dent 6(3): 133-8
33- Huth, K. C., E. Paschos, et al. (2005). "Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques-randomized controlled trial." J Dent Res 84(12): 1144-8
34- Ibricevic, H. and Q. al-Jame " .(2000)Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up." J Clin Pediatr Dent 24(4): 269-72
2- Rule D.C. And Patel S. “Endodontics in children” In Harthy’s Endodontics In Clinical Practice 4th Ed. Bath Press 1997:P.191.
3- Fuks ABKA, Guelmann M.2013. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: al C, editor. Pediatric dentistry infancy through adolescence. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; . pp. 333–51
4- Guidelines (2008). “Guideline On Pulp Therapy For Primary and Young Permanent Teeth” Pediatr Dent 30(7 Suppl): 170-4
5- WINTERS, J., CAMERON, A. C. & WIDMER, R. P. 2013. Pulp
therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Handbook of Pediatric Dentistry (Fourth Edition). Elsevier World Health Organization. Formaldehyde. Environmental Health Criteria 89, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, 1989.
6- Guidelines (2011),American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. “Guidelines On Pulp Therapy for Primary and Young Permanent Teeth”. Paediatr Dent;33:212-9.
7-WATERHOUSE, P. 1995. Formocresol and alternative primary molar pulpotomy medicaments: a review. Dental Traumatology, 11, 157-162
8- Arnold R. Martin. Anti-Infective Agents, Chap 7 In ( Wilson and Gisvold's Textbook of Organic Mediciol and pharmaceutical Chemistry), Lippincott- Raven, 1998 : 175_177.
9- Actoren ,O. Ferric sulfate, Glutar aldehyde and Formocresol Pulpotomies in Primary teeth, J. Dent Res, 1998:77.
10- RANLY, D. M., GARCIA‐GODOY, F. & HORN, D. 1988. A comparison of the effects of cresol and eugenol on bovine pulp. Dental Traumatology, 4, 70-75
11- RUBY, J. D., COX, C. F., MITCHELL, S. C., MAKHIJA, S., CHOMPU‐INWAI, P. & JACKSON J. 2013.A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. International journal of paediatric dentistry, 23, 145-152.
12- Milnes, A. R. (2006). Persuasive evidence that formocresol use in pediatric dentistry is safe. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 72(3)
13-World Health Organization. Formaldehyde. Environmental Health Criteria 89, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, 1989.
14- Smith, N. L, Seale N. S, et al "Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: a retrospective study. " Pediatr Dent 22(3), 2000: 192-9.
15- Ibricevic, H. and Q. Al-Jame " Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow - up study." Eur J Paediatr Dent 4(1), 2003: 28-32. 5
16- Sonmez, D., S. Sari, et al. (2008). "A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up." J Endod 34(8): 950-5.
17- Fei, A. L., Udin, R. D. "A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth." Pediatr Dent, (1991). 3(6): 327-32.
18- 7- LANDAU,M.J; JOHNSON,D.C. Pulpal response to ferric sulfate in monkeys. J.Dental.research.67:215 abstr,no 822,1988.
19- Aktoren O. and Gencay K.” A two year clinical radiographic follow-up of the pulpotomies in primary molars” J Dent Res, 2000; 79: 543(abstract).
20- ERDEM, A. P., GUVEN, Y., BALLI, B., ILHAN, B., SEPET, E., ULUKAPI, I. & AKTOREN, O. 2011. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study. Pediatric dentistry, 33, 165-170
21- Dean, J. A. (2016). Treatment of deep caries, vital pulp exposure, and pulpless teeth. In McDonald and Avery's Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent (Tenth Edition) (pp. 221-242
22- McDonald. R.E, Avery, D.R, And Dean, J.A. " Treatment of deep caries, vital pulp exposure, and pulpess teeth" . InEds.McDonald,R.E, R.E, and Avery D.R, Dentistry for the child and adolescent . (Ninth edition), St. Louis, the C.V Mosby Co. 2011:343365.
23- ANSARI, G., MOROVATI, S. P. & ASGARY, S. 2018. Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iranian Endodontic Journal, 1, 7-12.
24- مسلماني وليد , "تقييم نجاح بتر اللب بالإسمنت البورتلاندي على الأرحاء المؤقتة" , رسالة ماجستير , جامعة دمشق , 2015 .
25- قبش خالد ، دراسة سريرية مقارنة بين الفورموكريزول والغلوتار ألدهيد في بتر اللب على الأسنان المؤقتة، رسالة ماجستير ، جامعة دمشق ، 2001.
26- لفلوف مهند. مقارنة بين بتر اللب بالفورموكريزول مع بتر اللب بالتخثير الكهربائي وبسلفات الحديد، رسالة ماجستير، جامعة دمشق، 1999.
28- SUSHYNSKI, J. M., ZEALAND, C. M., BOTERO, T. M., BOYNTON, J. R., MAJEWSKI, R. F., SHELBURNE, C. E. & HU, J. C. 2012. Comparison of gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a 6-to 24-month observation. Pediatric dentistry, 34, 120E-128E.
29- JUNEJA, P. & KULKARNI, S. 2017. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 18, 271-278
30- شفا عمري أحمد."تأثير بعض الحشوات القاعدية على نجاح بتر اللب بكبريتات الحديدي على الأرحاء المؤقتة" رسالة ماجستير، جامعة دمشق، 2014
31- Agamy, H, Bakrry. N, Avery D, " Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth" Pediatr dent vol.26, No.4, 2004.
32- Markovic, D., V. Zivojinovic, et al. (2005). "Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth." Eur J Paediatr Dent 6(3): 133-8
33- Huth, K. C., E. Paschos, et al. (2005). "Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques-randomized controlled trial." J Dent Res 84(12): 1144-8
34- Ibricevic, H. and Q. al-Jame " .(2000)Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up." J Clin Pediatr Dent 24(4): 269-72